|
The IntegersI've been reviewing some basic number theory, so I tried to look up the defining properties of the integers in Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics (MathWorld). Much to my surprise, I didn't find a definition in the sense that I was looking for. I wanted a list of defining properties. Feel free to look at the MathWorld entry for Integer. The natural numbers are a natural consequence of the fact that we can count the members of a set in any order and we always get the same answer. Consider a set A that you want to count, and the set B which are the natural numbers from one to the size of A. No matter how you count A, you always use the elements of B once each. Using mathematical language: If you have two finite sets A and B, and there exists a one-to-one correspondence between A and B, then there is no one-to-one correspondence between A and any proper subset of B. Counting is a wonderful thing, and much of mathematics can be derived as a consequence of it. The integers Z are just the generalization of the natural numbers: Z = {..., –3, –2, –1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}. So we certainly know what the integers are. But how do we define them? Well, my search through MathWorld led me back to the definition of an Integral Domain. Any set S together with two binary operators + and · is an Integral Domain if it has the following properties for all a, b and c in S:
Now, the integers are not the only integral domain. There are others, most notably congruence arithmetic modulo-p, where p is prime. This month's question: What defining properties do the Integers have that distinguish them from other integral domains? This month's topic has been well-covered historically, and you can just look it up—but where's the fun in that? The fun is that there's more than one way to get the job done. |
Send all responses to
.
Thanks,
Steve